next previous
Up: Imaging polarimetry of some clouds


4 Result and discussions

In Tables 4-13, we reproduce the observed linear polarization (p), error in estimated polarization ($E_{\rm p}$), corresponding PA values ($\theta $) and m (relative magnitudes) in Cols. 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively for the stars in these clouds. These magnitudes are just a conversion from the CCD counts and therefore it is merely an indication of the relative intensity of the stars. One should also note that the magnitude scale is not necessarily same for all the clouds[*]. The PA ($\theta $) values are corrected by the $\theta $-offset as obtained after the observation of polarimetric standard stars (please refer to Sect. 3). The field stars in a cloud can be identified through their RA and DEC co-ordinates available in Cols. 2 and 3.


 

 
Table 4: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB3

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

0:28:48.8 56:39:19 1.145 0.039 62.0 12.08
2 0:28:52.6 56:39:26 1.903 0.509 68.2 15.94
3 0:28:33.4 56:39:33 2.258 0.243 69.9 15.46
4 0:28:43.4 56:39:46 1.714 0.390 64.6 15.81
5 0:28:45.9 56:39:51 1.203 0.071 63.4 13.72
6 0:28:33.9 56:39:54 0.600 0.035 73.2 11.13
7 0:28:47.1 56:40:7 1.182 0.055 64.5 13.07
8 0:28:57.1 56:40:10 1.131 0.303 63.0 15.35
9 0:28:56.2 56:40:13 0.736 0.043 69.7 12.13
10 0:28:39.3 56:40:9 2.221 0.615 45.7 16.27
11 0:28:42.5 56:40:10 0.474 0.056 19.5 13.87
12 0:29:1.8 56:40:38 0.990 0.132 54.5 14.30
13 0:28:43.3 56:40:39 1.669 0.749 28.5 16.45
14 0:28:58.3 56:41:4 2.148 0.424 84.7 15.93
15 0:29:7.8 56:41:12 1.582 0.102 67.9 13.67
16 0:28:39.0 56:41:19 0.846 0.185 73.2 14.60
17 0:28:55.8 56:41:36 0.987 0.156 81.6 14.72
18 0:28:51.3 56:41:42 1.642 0.036 74.6 12.85
19 0:28:49.0 56:41:45 2.586 0.104 76.9 13.34
20 0:28:40.2 56:41:48 2.031 0.090 106.0 13.46
21 0:28:46.1 56:41:50 0.515 0.036 69.9 12.86
22 0:28:22.8 56:42:15 2.817 0.889 75.7 16.39
23 0:28:28.9 56:42:34 2.095 0.338 73.1 15.91
24 0:29:8.1 56:42:46 1.068 0.111 60.4 14.31
25 0:28:57.9 56:42:48 2.144 0.063 58.1 14.15
26 0:28:24.5 56:42:47 0.830 0.068 72.3 13.37
27 0:28:43.5 56:42:52 0.917 0.042 66.3 13.31
28 0:28:58.6 56:43:18 1.014 0.029 59.9 12.87
29 0:28:43.7 56:43:18 0.951 0.202 71.2 14.66
30 0:29:3.0 56:43:42 1.037 0.046 61.3 13.72
31 0:28:32.1 56:44:13 1.449 0.034 48.6 12.49



 

 
Table 5: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB25

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

4:59:20.2 52:1:5 2.791 0.208 153.8 14.47
2 4:58:54.4 52:1:12 2.452 0.322 150.3 15.72
3 4:59:13.5 52:1:15 1.983 0.270 154.7 15.55
4 4:58:55.2 52:2:14 1.689 0.247 160.9 14.08
5 4:59:4.8 52:2:32 2.478 0.304 148.3 15.61
6 4:59:21.8 52:2:35 3.120 0.489 150.9 15.98
7 4:59:13.0 52:3:19 3.246 0.395 150.7 16.00
8 4:59:20.1 52:3:26 3.033 0.165 149.5 14.81
9 4:58:49.4 52:4:8 2.932 0.069 147.3 12.69
10 4:59:13.1 52:4:24 2.614 0.472 147.8 16.01
11 4:58:50.9 52:4:39 0.693 0.104 167.2 14.01
12 4:58:47.8 52:4:41 1.812 0.461 150.6 16.16
13 4:58:45.2 52:4:55 2.313 0.437 160.2 15.83
14 4:59:21.1 52:5:10 2.969 0.264 150.7 15.82
15 4:58:50.5 52:5:8 2.269 0.061 152.2 13.98
16 4:58:58.7 52:5:10 2.417 0.313 143.8 15.78
17 4:58:56.6 52:5:18 1.729 0.458 144.4 16.36
18 4:59:12.0 52:5:33 1.794 0.676 150.9 16.41
19 4:58:54.5 52:5:55 1.998 0.169 146.3 14.86
20 4:58:49.1 52:5:58 3.858 0.444 147.3 16.70
21 4:59:2.5 52:6:1 1.263 0.707 141.0 16.62



 

 
Table 6: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB39

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

6:1:59.2 16:27:56 2.275 0.605 162.3 16.22
2 6:1:58.3 16:27:59 1.730 0.645 134.6 16.09
3 6:1:56.9 16:28:19 2.624 0.052 156.6 13.84
4 6:1:57.4 16:28:29 2.041 0.346 159.7 15.33
5 6:1:55.4 16:28:44 1.897 0.196 155.1 14.71
6 6:1:51.0 16:29:7 2.113 0.875 149.3 16.07
7 6:1:46.9 16:29:10 0.958 0.418 160.6 15.79
8 6:2:4.7 16:29:25 1.728 0.371 141.6 16.27
9 6:1:52.4 16:29:41 2.908 0.050 157.7 13.38
10 6:2:7.6 16:29:55 2.326 0.121 166.1 13.97
11 6:1:50.0 16:30:8 1.921 0.415 164.3 15.46
12 6:2:10.2 16:30:31 2.291 0.464 163.0 16.05
13 6:1:47.4 16:30:56 1.092 0.039 167.0 12.88
14 6:2:5.8 16:31:41 1.937 0.227 152.6 14.63
15 6:1:53.2 16:31:42 2.667 0.603 171.1 15.46
16 6:1:48.1 16:31:51 1.172 0.032 162.5 13.06
17 6:1:49.8 16:32:0 1.862 0.223 178.0 14.84
18 6:2:9.9 16:32:27 1.924 0.160 165.4 14.70
19 6:2:11.8 16:32:29 2.555 0.887 164.6 16.43
20 6:1:49.2 16:32:41 1.593 0.038 165.2 12.92
21 6:2:1.7 16:33:1 1.264 0.051 138.3 13.58



 

 
Table 7: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB52

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

6:48:52.1 -16:56:50 0.451 0.073 96.8 12.38
2 6:48:53.3 -16:56:0 1.457 0.853 95.0 16.45
3 6:48:40.1 -16:56:9 0.462 0.552 45.2 15.14
4 6:48:43.0 -16:55:58 1.908 0.325 149.7 15.77
5 6:48:56.9 -16:54:40 2.695 1.449 24.1 16.70
6 6:48:32.1 -16:54:29 0.226 0.170 43.6 13.94
7 6:48:39.1 -16:54:7 1.416 0.117 152.8 12.88
8 6:48:35.6 -16:53:52 1.180 0.804 137.2 15.68
9 6:48:56.9 -16:53:29 3.286 1.114 12.8 16.26
10 6:48:57.3 -16:53:12 0.948 0.064 52.6 13.70
11 6:48:53.9 -16:53:7 2.192 0.557 146.2 15.39
12 6:48:53.8 -16:52:8 1.145 1.149 81.0 16.13
13 6:48:51.2 -16:51:36 1.121 0.891 140.8 15.72
14 6:48:34.8 -16:51:10 0.472 1.012 24.4 15.48
15 6:48:34.8 -16:50:44 0.209 0.365 34.9 15.64
16 6:48:54.5 -16:50:25 1.207 0.431 7.9 15.81



 

 
Table 8: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB54A

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

7:4:6.9 -16:24:48 0.105 0.027 153.6 11.41
2 7:4:27.4 -16:24:33 0.304 0.023 140.4 11.05
3 7:4:3.8 -16:23:28 0.215 0.086 115.5 12.24
4 7:4:8.9 -16:23:13 0.824 0.196 126.5 15.24
5 7:4:8.7 -16:23:1 0.203 0.131 154.2 14.60
6 7:4:27.7 -16:22:53 0.957 0.270 123.3 14.20
7 7:4:13.3 -16:22:43 1.019 0.214 177.5 13.97
8 7:4:25.9 -16:22:22 1.526 0.592 58.8 15.82
9 7:4:6.9 -16:22:23 0.913 0.206 96.1 14.14
10 7:4:25.2 -16:21:40 0.865 0.176 108.3 14.32
11 7:4:13.8 -16:21:32 1.306 0.421 146.7 15.74
12 7:4:12.4 -16:21:27 0.203 0.029 148.4 12.79
13 7:4:24.5 -16:21:20 0.787 0.195 78.2 14.80
14 7:4:17.9 -16:21:16 0.885 0.321 132.2 14.77
15 7:4:27.5 -16:21:5 0.475 0.239 76.8 14.67
16 7:4:19.5 -16:20:45 0.378 0.356 117.2 15.61
17 7:4:6.5 -16:20:34 1.494 0.126 74.5 14.12
18 7:4:9.9 -16:20:30 1.091 0.515 100.3 16.02
19 7:4:19.9 -16:20:23 0.758 0.391 91.2 16.23
20 7:4:10.1 -16:20:11 0.877 0.550 146.6 15.93
21 7:4:5.7 -16:20:9 3.635 0.610 50.2 16.71
22 7:4:6.8 -16:20:7 0.374 0.090 102.9 12.24
23 7:4:26.7 -16:19:50 0.764 0.570 108.7 16.12
24 7:4:5.4 -16:19:46 1.167 0.766 73.8 16.71
25 7:4:9.3 -16:19:39 0.450 0.323 123.1 15.46
26 7:4:22.5 -16:19:28 0.206 0.243 154.3 14.85
27 7:4:8.4 -16:19:18 0.546 0.123 116.5 12.56



 

 
Table 9: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB54B

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

7:4:21.7 -16:29:36 0.571 0.098 128.2 14.32
2 7:4:0.5 -16:29:30 0.396 0.027 111.8 11.08
3 7:4:22.9 -16:29:17 1.446 0.113 174.4 14.74
4 7:4:11.1 -16:28:43 0.531 0.097 141.4 14.21
5 7:4:9.2 -16:28:40 1.628 0.511 164.4 15.94
6 7:4:2.0 -16:28:37 0.549 0.133 80.6 14.29
7 7:4:20.3 -16:28:31 0.234 0.047 147.0 12.64
8 7:4:16.9 -16:28:23 1.102 0.303 164.8 15.28
9 7:4:4.8 -16:27:53 0.624 0.051 135.1 13.71
10 7:4:17.6 -16:27:48 1.022 0.171 138.7 15.15
11 7:4:10.1 -16:27:41 1.141 0.236 130.6 15.09
12 7:4:1.8 -16:27:13 0.936 0.137 119.2 14.45
13 7:4:22.4 -16:26:46 0.671 0.112 113.0 13.64
14 7:4:5.4 -16:26:33 2.062 0.474 140.6 15.90
15 7:4:9.9 -16:26:20 0.678 0.161 115.2 14.04
16 7:4:3.0 -16:26:2 0.131 0.061 157.5 13.19
17 7:4:18.7 -16:25:56 0.292 0.088 92.4 13.79
18 7:4:24.9 -16:25:54 3.130 0.292 164.3 15.26
19 7:4:19.4 -16:25:38 1.142 0.336 137.8 15.52
20 7:4:8.1 -16:25:2 0.501 0.034 120.0 12.22
21 7:4:6.6 -16:24:47 0.123 0.042 153.4 11.50



 

 
Table 10: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB58

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

7:18:6.1 -23:40:40 2.368 1.088 93.4 15.78
2 7:18:2.2 -23:40:7 1.859 0.447 152.5 15.32
3 7:18:1.8 -23:40:6 0.890 0.258 139.8 14.10
4 7:17:57.5 -23:39:45 0.773 0.336 46.6 15.18
5 7:17:56.2 -23:39:38 2.495 0.920 118.2 16.25
6 7:17:59.0 -23:39:29 0.902 0.198 125.3 13.29
7 7:18:1.2 -23:39:3 1.136 0.577 109.6 15.46
8 7:18:14.3 -23:39:6 3.500 1.159 70.7 16.36
9 7:18:0.5 -23:38:59 3.026 1.140 105.6 15.77
10 7:18:21.6 -23:38:51 1.786 0.241 57.2 14.37
11 7:17:54.5 -23:38:39 0.614 0.238 140.9 14.33
12 7:17:57.3 -23:38:32 1.818 0.275 136.2 15.47
13 7:17:53.7 -23:38:24 1.404 0.502 113.2 15.29
14 7:17:53.3 -23:38:21 4.926 1.785 159.7 16.35
15 7:18:20.6 -23:38:13 2.159 0.925 18.4 15.57
16 7:18:16.0 -23:37:41 0.205 0.053 28.1 12.03
17 7:17:59.4 -23:37:32 0.111 0.043 101.6 12.07
18 7:18:7.1 -23:37:34 4.079 1.200 169.2 16.66
19 7:17:57.7 -23:37:21 0.998 0.344 89.1 15.29
20 7:18:5.1 -23:37:4 2.214 0.441 156.7 15.50
21 7:18:2.7 -23:37:3 1.229 0.442 118.8 15.57
22 7:18:1.2 -23:36:56 4.164 1.995 46.8 16.70
23 7:17:55.6 -23:36:40 0.810 0.185 103.9 13.33
24 7:18:19.9 -23:36:26 0.212 0.087 136.5 13.39
25 7:18:7.2 -23:36:13 0.111 0.048 48.8 12.23
26 7:17:57.3 -23:36:0 0.697 0.310 107.1 14.36
27 7:18:10.3 -23:35:45 0.357 0.126 9.3 13.42
28 7:17:60.0 -23:35:31 1.789 0.433 123.2 15.21
29 7:18:15.1 -23:35:19 5.772 2.576 104.3 16.77



 

 
Table 11: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB62

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

13:30:32.2 79:20:23 0.223 0.118 164.7 16.83
2 13:29:23.5 79:19:39 0.664 0.355 43.9 17.34
3 13:30:15.3 79:20:35 0.404 0.249 54.3 14.22
4 13:30:38.9 79:21:49 1.849 0.991 105.1 17.40
5 13:29:10.0 79:20:38 1.186 0.685 132.5 17.37
6 13:30:52.4 79:22:13 0.196 0.126 54.5 13.80
7 13:30:56.8 79:22:41 0.200 0.104 55.4 16.47
8 13:30:29.8 79:22:49 0.125 0.065 99.8 16.60
9 13:30:20.2 79:23:51 0.387 0.203 69.3 17.08
10 13:30:53.9 79:24:46 2.590 1.296 173.4 17.20
11 13:28:51.7 79:23:18 0.149 0.076 62.3 14.01
12 13:30:18.8 79:24:02 0.157 0.101 7.2 16.65
13 13:30:14.0 79:24:16 0.962 0.498 36.9 17.18



 

 
Table 12: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB246

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

23:56:49.1 58:31:29 0.699 0.200 57.9 11.05
2 23:56:26.0 58:32:21 3.719 0.284 90.7 15.50
3 23:56:36.2 58:32:34 0.597 0.051 66.4 11.98
4 23:56:51.9 58:33:53 2.265 0.641 55.7 16.12
5 23:57:5.4 58:34:16 2.773 0.625 64.5 16.00
6 23:56:57.9 58:34:25 2.282 0.153 49.9 14.57
7 23:56:20.2 58:35:8 2.113 0.246 93.9 15.85
8 23:56:54.6 58:35:20 3.839 0.785 59.1 16.66
9 23:57:2.3 58:35:25 0.879 0.353 65.3 14.79
10 23:56:24.3 58:36:26 1.844 0.184 117.2 14.98
11 23:56:53.8 58:36:33 2.314 1.107 52.4 16.72
12 23:56:53.3 58:36:45 1.600 0.185 67.1 15.21
13 23:56:55.1 58:36:49 0.756 0.298 40.3 15.35
14 23:56:41.7 58:36:48 1.263 0.125 63.6 14.88



 

 
Table 13: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB3N

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

0:28:43.9 56:34:52 1.135 0.157 61.2 14.92
2 0:28:49.5 56:35:21 1.193 0.095 60.9 13.80
3 0:28:59.5 56:35:25 1.390 0.113 60.7 14.70
4 0:29:8.6 56:35:37 1.104 0.189 72.3 14.85
5 0:28:59.2 56:35:42 1.355 0.083 63.7 14.24
6 0:28:59.1 56:35:50 0.932 0.229 66.3 15.15
7 0:28:42.7 56:36:7 1.268 0.111 55.8 13.87
8 0:28:56.0 56:36:24 1.131 0.132 65.4 14.70
9 0:29:2.9 56:36:26 1.309 0.047 66.2 13.57
10 0:29:10.8 56:36:27 1.226 0.073 62.7 13.42
11 0:28:53.7 56:36:31 1.436 0.630 60.2 16.48
12 0:28:52.7 56:36:34 0.734 0.244 67.6 15.68
13 0:29:1.0 56:36:52 1.241 0.141 65.5 14.68
14 0:28:42.4 56:37:6 0.854 0.091 67.5 13.66
15 0:28:27.7 56:37:12 0.800 0.103 70.3 13.83
16 0:29:7.7 56:37:17 1.281 0.146 59.2 14.77
17 0:28:51.8 56:37:21 0.368 0.142 88.5 14.75
18 0:29:6.7 56:37:32 1.422 0.090 73.9 13.83
19 0:28:38.3 56:37:36 1.189 0.338 63.7 15.92
20 0:28:25.2 56:37:44 1.281 0.112 73.1 14.56
21 0:28:32.7 56:38:2 0.958 0.263 46.2 15.76
22 0:28:54.6 56:38:5 0.968 0.356 71.8 16.04
23 0:29:10.3 56:38:42 1.456 0.074 64.8 14.07
24 0:29:5.1 56:38:43 0.509 0.352 46.9 16.61
25 0:28:40.8 56:38:57 0.324 0.065 67.1 12.70
26 0:29:2.7 56:39:4 1.296 0.161 59.4 15.12
27 0:29:7.7 56:39:6 1.567 0.053 55.8 12.99
28 0:28:47.6 56:39:17 1.181 0.051 62.5 12.09
29 0:28:25.4 56:39:15 0.194 0.127 37.6 14.94
30 0:28:46.6 56:39:21 0.684 0.102 67.3 13.69
31 0:28:51.5 56:39:23 1.399 0.371 57.7 15.93
32 0:28:44.7 56:39:50 1.147 0.065 58.0 13.68
33 0:28:55.3 56:40:11 0.794 0.032 60.7 12.16



 

 
Table 14: Observed linear polarization values for various field stars in CB25N

Sr.#

RA(2000) DEC(2000) p(%) $E_{\rm p}$(%) $\theta $ m

1

4:58:54.0 51:57:16 3.874 0.242 152.5 15.61
2 4:59:16.2 51:57:17 2.154 0.545 162.2 16.52
3 4:59:17.6 51:57:19 2.695 0.077 160.5 14.53
4 4:58:57.2 51:57:56 3.658 0.083 155.0 12.78
5 4:58:45.3 51:58:9 1.714 0.048 163.7 11.66
6 4:59:22.8 51:58:12 1.810 0.187 163.1 16.00
7 4:59:5.1 51:58:20 2.821 0.875 139.2 16.25
8 4:59:7.6 51:58:53 2.104 0.884 129.4 16.86
9 4:58:53.7 51:59:1 3.769 0.366 145.9 16.35
10 4:59:1.4 51:59:46 4.064 0.669 160.0 16.26
11 4:58:53.5 52:0:8 3.485 0.956 155.7 16.96
12 4:59:12.9 52:0:20 1.343 0.482 155.9 16.54
13 4:58:41.8 52:0:33 1.250 0.625 154.6 15.62
14 4:59:16.7 52:0:36 1.967 0.190 153.8 15.36
15 4:59:1.8 52:0:54 2.267 0.154 149.7 14.67
16 4:59:21.1 52:1:1 2.412 0.233 154.1 14.68
17 4:59:14.2 52:1:12 1.815 0.181 159.0 15.68
18 4:58:54.7 52:1:12 1.970 0.215 148.7 15.84



 

 
Table 15: The average direction of polarization and its dispersion (stars with $ p < 0.5\%$ and/or ${{E_{\rm p}}\over {p}} > 0.5$ have been excluded)
Cloud $\theta_{\rm average}$ (in degree) $\sigma_{\theta}$ (in degree)

CB3

65.6 15.6
CB3N 63.5 6.0
CB25 151.4 5.8
CB25N 153.6 8.8
CB39 158.9 10.7
CB52 147.2 50.4
CB54A 106.1 37.5
CB54B 135.5 23.8
CB58 108.5 39.6
CB62 poor data poor data
CB246 67.4 20.2


We draw these polarization vectors on the respective position of the stars on the DSS map (Digital Sky Survey map of Palomar Observatory). The length of the vector is proportional to the degree of polarization. The vector line is drawn making an angle with the N-axis (towards East), which is equal to the PA values tabulated in Col. 6. However before plotting, all these $\theta $ values were corrected by the off-set ( $\rm d \theta$) discussed earlier for the corresponding nights of observations (please refer to Sect. 3). Also on the left-hand corner of each map we have plotted the direction of increasing galactic longitude ($\nabla l$). This will give us the projection of galactic plane in that region of the sky, which is expected to be the projected direction of local galactic magnetic field. These polarization maps for all the above clouds are reproduced in Figs. 1-10.

When we observe polarization for the stars in a particular cloud, we are not sure whether the observed polarization is introduced by the cloud or it is just the interstellar polarization for that part of the sky or a combination of the two. To ascertain this, we observed nearby regions of two individual clouds, viz. CB3N and CB25N. We notice that, both these regions contain a set of almost unidirectional polarization vectors and the observed degrees of polarizational don't differ much from star to star. This can be considered to be characteristic of interstellar polarization for that part of the sky.

Also we can see both the clouds CB3 and CB25 contain polarization vectors which mostly follow the trend observed in their respective nearby regions CB3N and CB25N. But the small twist in the orientation of polarization vectors in CB3 (in the lower part of the map) may be due to some reasons intrinsic to the cloud. CB25 mostly contain undisturbed polarization vectors.

Clemens et al. (1991) describe some classification scheme for these clouds and divide them into different groups A, B and C. Out of 248 clouds catalogued by CB, most (74%) of the clouds belong to group A, where gas temperatures are cool ( $ T < 8.5^{\circ}$ K) and turbulent gas motions are less (characterized by $^{12}\rm CO$ line widths $\Delta V < 2.5~ {\rm km~s}^{-1}$). When line widths are broader (> 2.5 km s-1), we get another set of cool clouds with unusual dynamical activity, these are group C clouds. Under group B we have warm clouds ( $ T > 8.5^\circ$ K) but they are less dynamic with narrow line widths. We have observed four clouds CB25, CB246, Cb39 and CB58 from group A and three clouds CB3, Cb54 (comprising two parts) and CB52 from group C (Clemens et al. 1991). Only for one cloud CB62 the group is not known. Keeping these classification in mind we can analyze the observed polarization values for each cloud.

For cloud CB3, the typical polarization values are between 1 - 2% and sometimes even more than 2%. There is not much dispersion among the observed polarization values. However, the polarization vectors do not seem to be aligned in the direction of $\nabla l$, which is the projection of galactic plane. Except for three or four stars, all the polarization vectors seem to be directed in some common direction. As discussed in Sect. 2. this cloud contains YSO, IRAS point source, further it belongs to group C, where some dynamical activities are expected.

CB25 and CB39 are two clouds, which exhibit the best alignment of their polarization vectors in the direction of $\nabla l$, among all the clouds we observed. Also the dispersion in PA ($\theta $) values seem to be very small in both the clouds. The alignment is slightly better in CB25 as compared to CB39. Both these clouds belong to A- group. Therefore we can expect, less dynamical activities and turbulences and here we observe better alignment of the grains (or polarization vectors). The cloud CB25, has polarization values typically near 2%, sometimes even exceeding 3%, however these polarization values can be attributed to the interstellar polarization as discussed earlier, with small contribution from the cloud.

For CB39 the polarization vectors are relatively less unidirectional, rather they represent some pattern. The cloud contains YSO, IRAS point sources and CO out flows, so it is definitely more active than CB25.

For CB52 (belonging to group C), the alignment of the polarization vectors appear to be disturbed. The polarization values quite dispersed. Some of the polarization vectors are aligned in the direction of $\nabla l$. This cloud contains YSO and IRAS point sources.

In CB54, there seems to be some emission nebulosity associated with the cloud and we have made observations on the north and south of this. For the northern part (CB54A) the alignment of the polarization vectors is rather poor, as compared to the southern part (CB54B). However, in the northern part of CB54A, the orientation of polarization vectors seem to follow some circular pattern. This is interesting and need to be studied more carefully. CB54 belongs to the dynamic group (C) and it contains YSO, IRAS point sources and CO out flows. The measured polarization values are generally close to 1% and there is wide dispersion among the direction of polarization vectors.

CB58 (belonging to group A) seems to be an interesting cloud with low to very high (4 - 5%) polarization values and direction of polarization vectors are scattered. This cloud seem to be violating the trend where we observed, group A clouds exhibiting slightly better alignment of the polarization vectors among themselves and also with the direction of $\nabla l$. This cloud contains YSO alone.

CB62 is the only cloud cloud which is quite above the galactic plane ( ${\rm bII} = 37.58^{\circ}$).
Otherwise all the clouds we observed are within the galactic disk ( ${\rm bII} < \pm 10^{\circ}$ please refer Table 1). Also we have no information about the group in which it belongs. Very few stars appear to be polarized in CB62. This is expected as the cloud is well above the galactic plane, so that the polarization caused by interstellar dust will be relatively less. The directions of polarization vectors seem to be scattered, with degree of polarization ranging from very low to above 2%. The polarization vectors do not appear to be aligned with the projected direction of galactic plane ($\nabla l$). If a typical Av for stars in CB62 is found to be similar to the Av for stars in the plane, this proves polarization is mostly interstellar in all the other cases (not arising from the cloud itself).

In CB246 (belonging to group A), polarization vectors are poorly aligned amongst themselves and also with the direction of $\nabla l$. However, if one separately considers the eastern and western regions in the cloud, one can see within these two individual regions the vectors are moderately aligned. This observed feature can be related to some activities in the cloud. However, as seen from Table 1, it does not contain YSO, IRAS point source or CO outflows.

The reason that the more "dynamic cloud'' shows generally poorer alignment with the galactic plane is that these regions tend to be warmer. Warmer regions have been shown to have better grain alignment. So it is possible that only in these clouds polarimetry is tracing the field, which in fact does not align with the galactic plane.

Also to draw a firmer conclusion about the alignments one needs a "control sample'' of "off/nearby'' positions where the projection direction is compared to the plane direction in the same way as for the globules. We have done it in a way for CB3 and CB25. However, we want to do it for all the globules in future.

In order to discuss about the alignment of the field or the lack of it in individual clouds, we have tabulated the average directions of polarization vectors ( $\theta_{\rm average}$) and the dispersions in the direction of polarization ( $\sigma_{\theta}$) in Table 15. If all the stars have ${{E_{\rm p}} \over{p}} =
0.5$, the error on the angle ($E_{\theta}$) would be $\sim$ 14 degrees. Hence one can say that a $\sigma _{\theta} < 10$ degrees would mean that the field is very well aligned, whereas a $\sigma _{\theta} \sim 50$ degrees would mean randomly directed polarization vectors (or field). Therefore CB52 represents almost random directions and CB54A & CB58 represent highly dispersed directions of polarization vectors with themselves and the galactic plane.

The disturbance in the polarization directions, that we have mentioned has been discussed extensively by Myers & Goodman (1991). Their analysis includes several clouds and the number distributions of polarization direction have a single maximum, with dispersion 0.2 - 0.4 radians. The observed distribution of polarization was modeled as arising from a magnetic field with uniform and non-uniform parts. The uniform part has an isotropic probability distribution of direction, a Gaussian distribution of amplitudes and N correlation lengths along the line of sight through the cloud (with the estimated upper limit $N_{\rm max} \sim 10$, based on the cutoff wavelength of hydromagnetic waves).


next previous
Up: Imaging polarimetry of some clouds

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)