Each person has their own favorite list of future observational needs. Here is mine:
We need a high rate (> 100 GRBs yr-1) of bursts with good
locations, in order to change the sociology of ground-based optical and
radio observations. This many good GRB positions to follow-up each
year would make it possible to propose and carry out GRB afterglow
monitoring programs at many medium-to-large aperture telescopes.
The diversity of GRBs, GRB afterglows, and host galaxies means that we
need a large number (> 1000) of good GRB positions in order to be
able to study the correlations between these properties. This is
important for determining whether or not there are distinct subclasses
of bursts, and more than one burst mechanism. Any correlations found
will also impose important constraints on burst mechanisms and models.
We need many rapid (near real time) one arcminute GRB positions in
order to determine whether or not significant optical emission
accompanies the bursts
(Park 1999),
and to make it possible to take
spectra of the burst afterglows while the afterglows are still bright
- and thereby obtain redshifts of the bursts themselves from
absorption line systems, and if there are bursts at high redshifts,
from the Ly
break.
All of the GRBs that BeppoSAX has detected are "long'' bursts.
Currently we know nothing about the afterglow properties, the distance
scale, and the hosts (if any) of "short'' bursts. Therefore we need
good/quick positions for short bursts, in order to determine these
properties for short bursts in the same way that BeppoSAX has enabled
us to determine these properties for long bursts.
Currently, there is a largely unexplored gap in our knowledge of the
X-ray and optical behavior of burst afterglows of
seconds immediately following the bursts, corresponding to the time
needed to bring the BeppoSAX NFIs to bear on a burst. We need to fill
in this unexplored gap, in order to see if bursts always, often, or
rarely join smoothly onto their X-ray and optical afterglows, and to
explore the geometry and kinematics of GRB afterglows
(Sari 1999).
We also need to search for variability in the X-ray and optical
afterglows. Observations of such variability would impose severe
constraints on models, including the widely-discussed relativistic
fireball model of burst afterglows (see, e.g.,
Fenimore 1999).
Acknowledgements
The Rome Workshop provided a feast of observational and theoretical results, and the opportunity to discuss them. On behalf of all of the Workshop participants, I would like to thank Enrico Costa, Luigi Piro, Filippo Fontana, and everyone else who helped to organize this meeting for bringing all of us together and for providing us with such "fine dining.''
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)