Up: The hardness evolution of
The observed fading multi-wavelength afterglows of gamma-ray bursts
are so far consistent
with the simple relativistic blastwave model (Mészáros & Rees
1997). The emission mechanism
resulting in the prompt gamma rays remains a mystery.
Studies of gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectral evolution have
uncovered many trends which may be used to confront models.
The discovery that
peak power energy
(which is the maximum of
, where
is photon energy and
is the specific energy flux)
often decays exponentially in bright,
long, smooth BATSE GRB pulses
as a function of photon fluence
(
)(Liang & Kargatis 1996,
hereafter LK96) provided a new constraint on emission mechanisms
(Liang et al. 1997;
Liang 1997;
Daigne & Mochkovitch 1998).
In their analysis, LK96 fit the function
|  |
(1) |
to 37 GRB pulses in 34 bursts.
To interpret this empirical trend, they differentiated
Eq. (1) to find
|  |
(2) |
where
is the BATSE energy flux
and
is the BATSE photon flux
(see Eq. (1) of LK96). We wished to avoid the
assumption that
and instead directly
tested the trend
by integrating it to give
|  |
(3) |
where
(
) is the BATSE energy fluence.
Our motivation for using the
-energy fluence relation (Eq. (3)) as opposed the
-photon fluence relation (Eq. (1)) is that we believe
that the former represents
a more physical quantity.
The BATSE LAD energy window was
designed to contain the peak of GRB
energy spectra, not the peak of the photon
spectra. By using
energy fluence, we avoid
the somewhat shaky assumption that the BATSE LAD
photon flux is proportional to the bolometric photon flux.
Up: The hardness evolution of
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)