Up: Optical and near-infrared observations box,
The error box of the BATSE gamma-ray burst GRB 970616
(Connaughton et al. 1997) was scanned by RXTE four hours after the event
(Marshall et al. 1997). Observations revealed a previously unknown X-ray source inside the
error box whose position was consistent with the one provided later on by
the Interplanetary Network (IPN), yielding a combined RXTE/IPN trapezoidal
error box
(Hurley et al. 1997). Four days later, the ASCA satellite
observed the RXTE/IPN error box and detected four X-ray sources.
One of
them, A#1 according to the nomenclature of
Murakami et al. (1997), was
suggested as the X-ray counterpart to GRB 970616. Two candidates were
initially proposed by Galama et al. (1997)
and Udalski (1997), but other
observers (Pahre et al. 1997;
Dey et al. 1997;
Wheeler et al. 1997;
Castro-Tirado et al. 1997) failed to confirm these. Observations performed
by ROSAT during June 23-25 revealed eleven faint X-ray sources, lying three
of them within the RXTE/IPN error box. One of the three sources, R#2,
following Greiner et al. (1997), was consistent with the ASCA variable
source A#1, showing a flux five times lower than the one measured by ASCA.
The 3
upper limit to the unabsorbed ROSAT flux of the source A#4,
implies a factor of seven lower than the previously measured by ASCA. The
fading observed during the ASCA observation could suggest that A#1 is the
X-ray counterpart to the GRB. However, the presence of another decaying
X-ray source inside the RXTE/IPN error box keeps open the association with
the GRB. A massive cluster of galaxies
away from the RXTE/IPN
error box is reported by
Benítez et al. (1999). Figure 1 shows the
locations of the cluster and of the candidates proposed by
Galama et al. (1997)
and Udalski (1997).
Up: Optical and near-infrared observations box,
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)