For a proper identification of source types, the ISOGAL results need to be compared with observations at other wavelengths. In particular, for the study of AGB stars comparisons with near IR observations, taken primarily with DENIS (Epchtein 1998), are useful. For the study of HII regions comparisons with radio continuum surveys are more appropriate.
A large fraction of the northern sky galactic fields covered by ISOGAL
have already been observed at 6 cm (5 GHz)
with the VLA (see Becker et al. 1994 and references
therein), and a comparison of the two surveys is underway.
However, these radio observations
terminate at and there were no high frequency (e.g.
5 GHz) radio
continuum observations for the ISOGAL field at
.
Observations at lower frequencies, such as the 1.4 GHz NRAO-VLA
Sky Survey (NVSS - Condon et al. 1998), are inadequate to detect
the younger and more dense compact HII regions, which
may be optically thick at 1.4 GHz.
Given our interest, within the ISOGAL team, to study the young massive
stars, we decided to observe the field at high frequencies
with the VLA, to provide a data base comparable to that of Becker et al. (1994).
In order to obtain radio spectral index information
we covered at 6 and 3.6 cm an area slightly larger than
the
ISOGAL field.
The selection of the ISOGAL galactic plane
fields does not follow any ad hoc criterion,
but is based on symmetrically spaced samples on both sides of the Galactic Center,
with the spacing increasing with distance from the Galactic Center.
The field happens to be located tangent to a spiral
arm of our Galaxy, the Scutum arm (see e.g. Kurtz et al. 1994). Inspection
of the 4.875 GHz galactic plane survey of Altenhoff et al. (1978)
shows that there is very weak diffuse galactic background emission
in this direction. Only 7 sources of the Altenhoff et al. catalogue fall
in our surveyed area or at its borders (see Table 4).
One of these (44.786 - 0.490) is partly outside our surveyed area.
Most of these sources are associated with bright IRAS point sources
and have not been covered by the ISOCAM observations except for
45.202-0.441 and 45.341-0.370.
In this work we present the radio observations and discuss the comparison with other radio surveys and with IRAS data. Comparison with ISOGAL data, as well as with dedicated J, H, K observations of the same field taken with TIRGO will be the subject of following works.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)