In the previous section we presented the properties of the different components
of NGC 1399 and the galaxy population in the center of the cluster.
In Fig. 2 we give a schematic overview of the surface
density/brightness (SD/SB) profiles of the different components and
their extension. The profiles are arbitrarily shifted in the ordinate axis.
The surface densities of GCs and
galaxies are number densities, whereas the profile of the galaxy light is a
surface brightness profile. Nevertheless, this is comparable to the number
density profile, if one assumes similar stellar populations and, accordingly,
similar M/LV ratios. The surface density of the X-ray gas is again a particle
(number) density, . The gas density profile
is derived from the surface brightness distribution of the X-ray gas
under the assumption of isothermal conditions (
) for a radius larger than about 10 kpc (Jones et al.
1997).
The plot shows that the profile slopes of the blue GC population and the cD halo
light are strikingly similar, whereas the distribution
of dE/dS0 galaxies is somewhat flatter in the central and slightly
steeper outside.
Interestingly, the surface density profile of the X-ray gas is also very similar
in slope and extension to the cD halo light and the blue GCs.
In contrast, the profile of the bulge light of NGC 1399 is significantly
steeper than all other profiles.
The same behaviour can be seen in the velocity dispersion.
It is comparable for dwarf galaxies and GCS, whereas the stars
in the stellar bulge have a lower (see also
Minniti et al. 1998;
Kissler-Patig et al. 1999).
This agreement in morphological and dynamical properties of GCs, the cD halo
light, and perhaps also the gas particles might suggest that
these components share a common history (or origin).
In the next section we describe some scenarios that might have happened
when dwarf galaxies interacted with the central cluster galaxy.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)