The NOT observations were carried out during a five night run from
August 31 to September 4
1996.
At NOT the ARNICA plate scale was
pix in order to match the better seeing (in fact,
during the whole run the images have been pixel-limited due to the excellent,
sub-arcsecond, seeing conditions). The field of view of each image is
thus
. In order to cover a larger field around each star,
we used a mosaicing technique that yields a constant signal to noise ratio on
a field of
diameter centered on the target star;
each mosaic consists of at least 42 partially overlapping frames. Flat fielding
has been performed using differential flat frames constructed by subtracting
one from the other two sky frames at different illumination,
obtained by median averaging various sets of
exposures at sunset and sunrise. The differential flat fielding
was necessary due to the high, spatially non-uniform emissivity
of the telescope (see also Hunt et al. 1996).
After flat fielding, sky subtraction was performed on each
frame using sky frame obtained by median averaging a set of exposures
in the mosaic, as described in Hunt et al. (1994).
After reduction the images were registered and
combined to form the final large mosaics. All the data reduction has been
performed using the IRAF
and ARNICA
(Hunt et al. 1994) software packages.
Photometric calibration was performed observing a set of near infrared
photometric standard stars from the
ARNICA (Hunt et al. 1998) list. The final calibration
accuracy is for all fields at the NOT and better than 8% at the
TIRGO (except for Z CMa). The calibration accuracy for each field is
reported in Table 1.
As discussed in Paper I, the automatic star finding algorithms have not proven to be completely reliable in finding all (and only) the point sources in every field, primarily because of the bright diffuse emission associated with some of the Herbig AeBe stars. Source lists in all fields have thus been individually edited and corrected by inspecting the images at different contrast levels.
Aperture photometry on the detected point sources was performed using the IRAF
DAOPHOT package and
a 4 pixel aperture for both TIRGO and NOT observations, corresponding to
and
respectively.
The
limiting magnitudes are reported in Table 1.
By checking the cumulative source count plots, we estimate our data to be
complete down to one magnitude brighter than the limiting magnitude
of each field.
Note that, as in Paper I, the TIRGO limiting
magnitudes refer to the "edges'' of the mosaics. Since the fields
have not been imaged with constant signal to noise, the central regions of
the mosaics are 0.5-1 magnitude deeper.
The completeness absolute
magnitude in K () has been
computed from the observed completeness magnitude
assuming the distance reported in Table 1 (Col. 11).
In computing
, we have
neglected the effect of extinction. We note however that
in the K band the correction
due to interstellar extinction is expected to be very low for all the
sources, with the possible exception of the most distant ones.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)