Up: The gain-elevation correction of
The IRAM 30-m telescope (Baars et al. 1987, 1994) is a homologous construction
(von Hoerner 1967a,b) so that for all elevation angles (
) the
best-fit reflector surface is a paraboloid. The homology does not eliminate
the gravity deformations of the reflector [
(i,
) for
the surface elements i = 1, 2, ..., N]; however, the root mean square (rms)
value
of the surface deformations of the best-fit parabolic reflector
is
|  |
(1) |
for all elevation angles (0
90
) and
wavelengths 
, with 
the shortest wavelength of observation of the telescope. If at the elevation
angle
0 the special adjustments
-
(i,
0) are applied on the reflector
surface, then (von Hoerner & Wong 1975) the reflector is free of gravity
deformations at
0 (= 43
for the 30-m telescope) and the
rms-value of the residual surface deformations is
| ![\begin{displaymath}
{\sigma}_{\rm g}({\epsilon}) =
{\sqrt{ {\sigma}(0)^{2}[{\rm ...
...ma}(90)^{2}[{\rm sin}{\epsilon} - {\rm sin}{\epsilon}_0]^{2}} }\end{displaymath}](/articles/aas/full/1998/18/ds1530/img10.gif) |
(2) |
with 
(
0) = 0, and
(0) and
(90)
(see below) the gravity induced deformations at horizon
(
= 0
) and zenith (
= 90
). The
elevation-dependent surface deformations 
(
) introduce
an elevation-dependent loss of gain for which astronomical observations must
be corrected. The rms-values 
(
) are derived from
finite element (FE) calculations of the reflector backstructure or from
radiometric measurements of astronomical sources. We use both methods and
explain, in particular, the gain-elevation dependence as function of the
source diameter (
). We provide information how to correct
observations made with the 30-m telescope. (See Baars et al. (1987) for
an earlier emphasis that a gain-elevation must be applied, at least at
short wavelength.)
Up: The gain-elevation correction of
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)