next previous
Up: AU Monocerotis-improved

4. Discussion and conclusions

Our analysis, with W-D method, of the corrected yellow light curve of AU Mon, obtained by Lorenzi (L80) yielded the most probable value of the photometric mass ratio, q=0.1985. This value is found, within observational errors, to be equal to the spectroscopic mass ratio derived by Popper (1989) from H lines. Hence we conclude that the presently derived absolute elements are most reliable. A comparison of the positions of the primary and secondary components on the Log tex2html_wrap_inline1521, versus tex2html_wrap_inline1523, tex2html_wrap_inline1525 and tex2html_wrap_inline1527 relations of the normal main sequence stars (Andersen 1991) indicate that while the primary component is having normal luminosity, bigger size and lower temperature, the secondary component is having higher luminosity, bigger size and normal temperature, in comparison to stars of similar mass. The normal HR diagram (Andersen 1991) shows that while the primary component is near but above the main sequence (brighter by tex2html_wrap_inline1121), the secondary is far above it and is overluminous by about tex2html_wrap_inline1123. In this respect, the secondary component shares the common property of overluminosity of the secondaries of the semi detached systems (Sarma et al. 1996). From the properties of the components of AU Mon, we conclude that it is a typical Algol type binary except that the eclipse light variations are superposed by intrinsic brightness variations. We suggest that a detailed study of the nature of the intrinsic variation in AU Mon is very important. According to Peters (1994) this variation is caused by the periodic changes in the rate of mass transfer from the secondary due to pulsations about its Roche surface which, in turn, would cause changes in the temperature of the mass accreting region around the primary. Alternately, we suggest that this variation may be due to the precession of the gaseous disc around the primary caused by the gravitational perturbations of the secondary component. Another point to notice is that while the spectral type of the secondary component as given by Dr. Morgan (in Sahade & Cesco 1945) is F0, the present study suggests it to be a F9-G0 star. Lorenzi (1983) suggests that early G is appropriate from photometry. This large discrepancy of about one spectral class may be attributed partly to the fact that we have observations in one pass band only. More importantly, corrections for the long term variations were not applied to the observations during the eclipse phases (L80) when a part of the variable source is covered causing an error in the depth of the eclipse. It is obvious that extensive photoelectric observations in as many pass bands as possible and high dispersion spectroscopic studies are needed for understanding the long term variations in AU Mon.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professeur K.D. Abhyankar for helpful suggestions. We also thank the referee, Professeur D.M. Popper, for many useful comments. MBKS wishes to thank the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for financial assistance under the Emeritus Scientists Scheme.


next previous
Up: AU Monocerotis-improved

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)