next previous
Up: Are metallic A-F

1. Introduction

Main sequence A and F stars show various interesting phenomena: chemical peculiarities (Am, Fm, Ap...) on the one hand and/or pulsation on the other hand. Numerous studies have been devoted to this part of the HR diagram near the ZAMS, but few have explored more evolved stars. In this paper, we examine the rate of binaries and rotation of giant A and F stars.

In a study of 132 giant A and F stars, Hauck (1986) showed that 36% of them have an enhanced value of the blanketing parameter tex2html_wrap_inline2467 (defined roughly speaking by tex2html_wrap_inline2497) characterising Am and tex2html_wrap_inline2481 Del stars. He showed also that this parameter could probably be interpreted in terms of metallicity for giant A and F stars. This interpretation was confirmed by Berthet (1990, 1991) from a detailed abundance analysis of such objects. His study pointed out that these stars have chemical properties similar to those of tex2html_wrap_inline2481 Del stars, i.e. an overabundance of iron peak elements and especially of heavier elements such as Sr and Ba, and solar composition for Ca and Sc. Am stars have similar characteristics for iron peak elements, but Ca and Sc are deficient by factors of about 10.

Based on chemical abundances, position in the tex2html_wrap_inline2503 plane of Strömgren photometry, rotation and duplicity of tex2html_wrap_inline2481 Del stars, Kurtz (1976) suggested that these stars are evolved Am stars. The fact that tex2html_wrap_inline2481 Del and giant metallic A and F stars harbour similar chemical properties suggests also a link between Am and giant metallic A and F stars. Thus, a star could begin its life on the main sequence as an Am star, then, as abundances of Ca and Sc increase to quasi-solar values with evolution, it would become a tex2html_wrap_inline2481 Del star and finally a giant metallic A-F where Ca and Sc are solar (Berthet 1992).

To explain the emergence of chemical anomalies in Am stars, one generally invokes the radiative diffusion theory developed by Michaud et al. (1983). This theory predicts that, in slow rotators, helium is no longer sustained and flows inside the star and gradually disappears from the atmosphere. The diffusion process could therefore take place just below the thin H convective zone where the diffusion time is short with respect to the stellar lifetime; the chemical elements whose radiative acceleration is larger than gravity become overabundant and, in the opposite case, underabundant. The convective zone becomes deeper with evolution and so leads to normalisation of the surface abundance. This theory explains the chemical anomalies in Am stars and the increase of Ca and Sc abundances with time.

The chemical anomalies predicted by the diffusion theory are generally larger than the observed anomalies. These differences come from uncertainties of the atomic data but also from some mechanism in the stellar atmosphere. The mass loss probably takes a prominent part: a rate of about tex2html_wrap_inline2511 is sufficient to reduce the theoretical overabundance of heavy elements to observed abundances (Charbonneau & Michaud 1991). Fast rotation (tex2html_wrap_inline2469 > 120 kms-1) generates meridional circulation which prevents the disappearance of the helium ionisation zone, so the metallic anomalies cannot appear (Michaud 1983). Observationally, the upper limit of rotation for Am stars is about 100 kms-1 (Abt & Moyd 1973), while for normal stars, we observe projected rotational velocities larger than 100 kms-1, which is in agreement with the diffusion theory. The meridional circulation cannot be invoked to reduce theoretical abundances to observed ones: in some cases, they can increase the theoretical abundances and qualitatively no relation exists between tex2html_wrap_inline2469 and the chemical anomalies in the velocity range characteristic of Am and Fm stars (tex2html_wrap_inline2525). Indeed, the time diffusion under the hydrogen convective zone is shorter than that of the meridional circulation.

The rate of binaries is completely different in Am and normal stars: Am stars are often members of tight binaries (tex2html_wrap_inline2527 100 days), while normal stars in double systems often have larger periods (P > 100 days). So, we would be tempted to explain the low rotation of Am stars by tidal braking. Nevertheless, Zahn (1977) showed that this effect is really important only for tight binaries with a period less than 7 days. On the other hand, Abt & Levy (1985) showed that 75% of Am stars have periods below 1000 days, so they do not necessarily belong to tight binaries. Other mechanisms must contribute to reduce the rotational velocity to 100 kms-1 or less. One of them may be the evolutionary expansion of stars during their main sequence lifetime. According to Abt & Levy (1985), during this phase, the velocity decreases by a factor of 2 and consequently most of the normal A stars may become Am stars before leaving the main sequence. These authors suggest also the possibility of tidal braking during the pre-main sequence phase to explain the exclusion of normal stars with a period comprised between 10 and 100 days.

The goal of the present work is to compare the tex2html_wrap_inline2469 and the rate of binaries among Am and giant metallic A and F stars in order to consider the possibility of a link between these two types of stars. To this end, we have measured at OHP some of Hauck's stars having no radial velocities or tex2html_wrap_inline2469, or only old determinations. These data should allow to strengthen a preliminary work (North 1994) which casts some doubts on the validity of the scenario advocated by Berthet (1992).


next previous
Up: Are metallic A-F

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr