next previous
Up: The classification of

1. Introduction

A number of objects identified in the Palomar-Green survey of faint blue stars were classified sdO(D) (Green et al. 1986), having strong HeI lines and weak or absent Balmer lines. Similar objects have been identified in other surveys of faint blue stars (Edinburgh-Cape, Hamburg-Schmidt) and are alternatively known as helium-rich subdwarf B stars (He-sdB) (Moehler et al. 1990). In an attempt to clarify the classifications currently in use, Drilling (1996) introduced the term sdB4 to denote these objects. A list complete to December 1995 was compiled by Jeffery et al. (1996).

Apart from spectroscopic identification the only previous work on these stars is a preliminary study which demonstrated the prototype PG1544+488 to be helium enriched (Heber et al. 1988) and analyses of JL87 (Schulz et al. 1991), LSIVtex2html_wrap_inline1915 (Viton et al. 1991) and LB1766 (Kilkenny & Busse 1992). These objects were shown to have similar tex2html_wrap_inline1917 to the more numerous sdB stars, but slightly lower surface gravity and much higher helium abundances.

The existence of extremely helium-rich stars otherwise similar to the better known but extremely hydrogen-rich subdwarf B stars suggests that they represent a vital link in the late stages of stellar evolution. A number of possibilities arise. Are they intrinsically the same objects as normal sdBs, but with their surface hydrogen mixed into helium-rich layers just below the surface? Are they more closely related to the hotter helium-rich sdOs lying close to the helium main- sequence and beyond the blue end of the horizontal branch? Or are they more closely related to the extreme helium stars, particularly the hottest high-gravity members of the class such as LSS3184 (Drilling et al. 1997) and LSIVtex2html_wrap_inline1919 (Jeffery 1996)?

In order to ascertain the nature of our targets more precisely, the authors have obtained optical spectroscopy and ultraviolet spectrophotometry of a significant sample. In this paper we examine the optical spectroscopy and review the classification of the targets. Refining the classification is a first step towards making more detailed atmospheric analyses of individual objects.

   

Object m B Instrument Date
PG0902+058 14.1 WHT+UES 1995 May 6, 7, 8
PG0902+058 CA 1988 May 25
PG0909+276 10.7 WHT+UES 1995 May 6, 7, 8
PG0909+276 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
PG0921+311 14.4 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
HS1000+4704 17.1 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1127+019 13.0 WHT+UES 1995 May 6, 7
PG1127+019 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1127+019 CA 1988 May 26
PG1230+067 12.3 WHT+UES 1995 May 6, 7, 8
TON107 16.3 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
PG1413+113 15.6 CA 1988 May 25
PG1415+492 14.4 WHT+UES 1995 May 7, 8
PG1415+492 CA 1988 May 26
PG1437+727 13.6 WHT+UES 1995 May 7tex2html_wrap_inline1923
PG1437+727 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30tex2html_wrap_inline1925
PG1441+407 15.5 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1526+440 15.7 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1544+488 12.0 WHT+UES 1995 May 7, 8
PG1544+488 CA 1988 May 26
PG1552+464 16.0 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1554+408 15.9 WHT+UES 1995 May 9
PG1554+408 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 31
PG1559+222 14.5 WHT+UES 1995 May 7, 8
PG1559+222 CA 1988 May 26
PG1600+171 16.3 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
PG1607+173 10.2 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
PG1615+413 16.4 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
PG1629+466 14.0 CA 1988 May 27
PG1629+466 WHT+UES 1995 May 9
PG1648+315 16.0 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
PG1658+273 15.7 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
PG1715+273 16.2 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
HS1843+6343 16.1 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
LS IV-14 116 13.0 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
PG2128+096 14.3 WHT+UES 1995 May 9
PG2128+096 WHT+ISIS 1996 May 30
PG2215+151 13.9 WHT+ISIS 1996 Jun. 1
Table 1: Optical spectroscopy of helium-rich subdwarf B stars. Magnitudes are primarily from Green et al. (1986)

tex2html_wrap_inline1923 wrong star of close pair
* two stars in slit, tex2html_wrap_inline1933 Å only.


next previous
Up: The classification of

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr