next previous
Up: Correction of the

Appendix B

For two wavenumbers tex2html_wrap_inline2412 and tex2html_wrap_inline2414 I define the corresponding envelopes tex2html_wrap_inline2416 and tex2html_wrap_inline2418, the phase functions tex2html_wrap_inline2420 and tex2html_wrap_inline2422, the shifted spectra tex2html_wrap_inline2424 and tex2html_wrap_inline2426, the odd and even functions tex2html_wrap_inline2428 and tex2html_wrap_inline2430, tex2html_wrap_inline2432 and tex2html_wrap_inline2434. By definition, there is a simple relation between tex2html_wrap_inline2436 and tex2html_wrap_inline2438:
equation759
Let us derive the expression of tex2html_wrap_inline2440:


eqnarray766
In the same way it can be shown that:


equation812
As a consequence, it is obvious that the envelopes are the same:


equation821
Let us show that the two calculi lead to the same phase function:


eqnarray833
The previous lines thus demonstrate that the envelope and the phase function do not depend on the choice of the shifting wavenumber. The derivation is still valid with tex2html_wrap_inline2442. In this case tex2html_wrap_inline2444 and:
eqnarray869


Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr